Fixed the error that the variable css_selector was originally assigned to list

[dominicx]

Summary

In CrawlerRunConfig, the css_selector is string, and will be split. but these files in doc css_selector is assigned an initial value of list type.

List of files changed and why

eg: quickstart.py - To update the example as per new changes
docs\md_v2\assets\llm.txt\txt\config_objects.txt - To change css_selector's value
docs\md_v2\assets\llm.txt\txt\llms-full.txt - To change css_selector's value
docs\md_v2\assets\llm.txt\txt\llms-full-v0.1.1.txt - To change css_selector's value

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Updated example usage of the css_selector parameter in configuration documentation to use a single comma-separated string instead of a list of selectors.
  • Added a missing trailing newline to a documentation file for improved formatting.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The changes update documentation examples for the css_selector parameter in CrawlerRunConfig usage, switching from a list of selectors to a single comma-separated string. No functional code or public entity declarations are modified; only documentation text is affected to reflect the new selector input format.

Changes

Files	Change Summary
docs/md_v2/assets/llm.txt/txt/config_objects.txt docs/md_v2/assets/llm.txt/txt/llms-full-v0.1.1.txt docs/md_v2/assets/llm.txt/txt/llms-full.txt	Updated css_selector usage in documentation examples from a list of strings to a comma-separated string. Added a trailing newline in one file.

Poem

A rabbit with docs in its paws,
Tweaked selectors without a pause.
From lists to strings, so neat and clean,
Commas unite where gaps had been.
Now configs read smooth and bright,
Documentation hopping right!
🐇✨

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Explain this complex logic.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
• @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)

docs/md_v2/assets/llm.txt/txt/llms-full.txt (1)

1050-1054: Earlier snippet still advertises list support – update for consistency

Line 1052’s comment # Can be list of selectors contradicts the one-string requirement introduced by this PR. Keeping both messages will confuse readers. Please adjust the comment (and, if needed, the surrounding prose) to reflect the new “single comma-separated string” guideline.

🧹 Nitpick comments (3)

docs/md_v2/assets/llm.txt/txt/llms-full-v0.1.1.txt (1)

1069-1076: Update earlier comment to avoid mixed guidance

This example now shows a single comma-separated string, which is great.
However, a few lines above (around 1052) the comment still says “Can be list of selectors”.
Please adjust that note (or remove it) so the documentation consistently reflects the new, string-only contract.

docs/md_v2/assets/llm.txt/txt/config_objects.txt (2)

445-452: Update earlier examples to avoid mixed guidance on css_selector.

Great catch switching the example here to a comma-separated string.
However, a few lines above (line 428) we still comment “# Can be list of selectors”, which now contradicts the stricter string-only guidance introduced by this PR. Tweaking that comment will prevent future confusion.

@@
-    css_selector="main.article, .content-area",  # Can be list of selectors
+    css_selector="main.article, .content-area",  # Comma-separated string of selectors

---

1169-1172: Duplicate “Learn more” footer – consider removing one.

Lines 1169 and 1171 show two nearly identical “📖 Learn more” blocks. Keeping a single consolidated list will read cleaner and avoid readers wondering whether they’ve missed a difference.

-**📖 Learn more:** [Hooks & Authentication](https://docs.crawl4ai.com/advanced/hooks-auth/), [Session Management](https://docs.crawl4ai.com/advanced/session-management/), [Network Monitoring](https://docs.crawl4ai.com/advanced/network-console-capture/), [Page Interaction](https://docs.crawl4ai.com/core/page-interaction/), [File Downloads](https://docs.crawl4ai.com/advanced/file-downloading/)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between bde1bba and eee52e8.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)

• docs/md_v2/assets/llm.txt/txt/config_objects.txt (2 hunks)
• docs/md_v2/assets/llm.txt/txt/llms-full-v0.1.1.txt (1 hunks)
• docs/md_v2/assets/llm.txt/txt/llms-full.txt (1 hunks)

🔇 Additional comments (1)

docs/md_v2/assets/llm.txt/txt/llms-full.txt (1)

1068-1076: Good fix, but consider mirroring the change in all code blocks

The switch to a comma-separated string for css_selector is correct here. Make sure every other example in this document (and in config_objects.txt, llms-full-v0.1.1.txt, etc.) follows the same pattern to avoid mixed messaging.