docs article section design break fix

[myself-alif]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Style
  • Improved spacing and layout in the article action section for a cleaner and more visually appealing interface.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The update modifies the layout spacing within the SectionArticles component, specifically increasing the gap between items in the article action section and adding a right margin to the comments container. No changes were made to logic, control flow, or exported entities.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Change Summary
UI Layout Adjustments src/components/DocListing/SectionArticles.js	Increased gap between items in the article action section and added right margin to comments container.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Poem

A rabbit hopped through lines of code,
Adjusting gaps where pixels flowed.
Margins grew with gentle care,
Making layouts sleek and fair.
No logic changed, just space anew—
A tidier view for all to view!
🐇✨

Note

⚡️ Unit Test Generation is now available in beta!

Learn more here, or try it out under "Finishing Touches" below.

✨ Finishing Touches

• 📝 Generate Docstrings

🧪 Generate unit tests

• Create PR with unit tests
• Post copyable unit tests in a comment
• Commit unit tests in branch article-section-design-break-fix

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

• Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
  • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
  • Explain this complex logic.
  • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
• Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai explain this code block.
  • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
• PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
  • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
  • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and explain its main purpose.
  • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
  • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Support

Need help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

• @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
• @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
• @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
• @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
• @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
• @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR.
• @coderabbitai generate sequence diagram to generate a sequence diagram of the changes in this PR.
• @coderabbitai generate unit tests to generate unit tests for this PR.
• @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
• @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
• @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

• Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
• Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
• Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

• You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
• Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
• If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

• Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
• Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
• Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)

src/components/DocListing/SectionArticles.js (1)

274-277: formattedDateString is passed as a function, not its result

sprintf expects a string, but the code supplies the function reference. This renders as "function formattedDateString()" instead of the formatted date.

-  __( 'Updated on %s', 'wedocs' ),
-  formattedDateString
+  __( 'Updated on %s', 'wedocs' ),
+  formattedDateString()

🧹 Nitpick comments (3)

src/components/DocListing/SectionArticles.js (3)

235-235: Verify enlarged gap – possible unintended extra whitespace on small viewports

gap-7 (1.75 rem) is noticeably wider than the surrounding gap-5 wrapper. On narrow screens this can push the updated-date block off-screen or create irregular spacing. Double-check the layout in mobile breakpoints; if the extra spacing is only desired on desktop, consider a responsive modifier:

-<div className="flex items-center gap-7">
+<div className="flex items-center sm:gap-7 gap-5">

---

245-245: Right-margin addition may break visual alignment with sibling controls

mr-6 adds 1.5 rem padding after the comments badge. Ensure it still lines up with the admin-restriction icon and contributors components, especially when either element is toggled off. Quick visual QA in the three comment states (disabled / zero / non-zero) is recommended.

---

95-101: Avoid repeated expensive filter calls – cache the result once

wp.hooks.applyFilters( 'wedocs_check_is_admin_restricted_article', … ) is invoked four times in this component. As it may hit external hooks, compute it once and reuse to reduce overhead and guarantee consistent return values.

-const isAdminRestrictedArticle = wp?.hooks?.applyFilters(
-  'wedocs_check_is_admin_restricted_article',
-  false,
-  article?.id
-);
+const isAdminRestrictedArticle = wp?.hooks?.applyFilters(
+  'wedocs_check_is_admin_restricted_article',
+  false,
+  article?.id
+);

Then use isAdminRestrictedArticle throughout.

Also applies to: 143-150

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7d2fc7e and e4d2a74.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• src/components/DocListing/SectionArticles.js (2 hunks)