Skip to content

Conversation

leander-dsouza
Copy link
Contributor

@leander-dsouza leander-dsouza commented Aug 8, 2025

🎉 New feature

Summary

  • Added dependabot configuration to periodically update outdated GitHub actions.

Test it

  • Once dependabot is enabled for this repository and this PR is merged, if any outdated GitHub actions exist, dependabot PRs having a prefix of 🛠️ would be created.

Checklist

  • Signed all commits for DCO
  • Added tests
  • Added example and/or tutorial
  • Updated documentation (as needed)
  • Updated migration guide (as needed)
  • Consider updating Python bindings (if the library has them)
  • codecheck passed (See contributing)
  • All tests passed (See test coverage)
  • While waiting for a review on your PR, please help review another open pull request to support the maintainers
  • Was GenAI used to generate this PR? If so, make sure to add "Generated-by" to your commits. (See this policy for more info.)

Note to maintainers: Remember to use Squash-Merge and edit the commit message to match the pull request summary while retaining Signed-off-by and Generated-by messages.

🔸🔸🔸🔸🔸🔸🔸🔸🔸🔸🔸🔸🔸🔸🔸🔸🔸🔸🔸🔸🔸🔸🔸🔸🔸🔸🔸🔸🔸🔸🔸🔸🔸🔸🔸🔸🔸

@github-actions github-actions bot added the 🏛️ ionic Gazebo Ionic label Aug 8, 2025
@leander-dsouza leander-dsouza marked this pull request as ready for review August 8, 2025 09:15
@leander-dsouza leander-dsouza requested a review from arjo129 as a code owner August 8, 2025 09:15
Copy link
Contributor

@arjo129 arjo129 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Seems reasonable enough to me, does any of the PMC object?

@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from Inbox to In review in Core development Aug 18, 2025
@leander-dsouza leander-dsouza requested a review from arjo129 August 18, 2025 22:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
🏛️ ionic Gazebo Ionic
Projects
Status: In review
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants