-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 6
New Rule 22-44 #1829
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: feature/ashrae-9012022
Are you sure you want to change the base?
New Rule 22-44 #1829
Conversation
docs/section22/Rule22-44.md
Outdated
- Note to RDS team - if there is missing output data the outcome is also UNDETERMINED with a message indicating that the modeled performance curves could not be evaluated. | ||
|
||
**Notes:** | ||
1. Can we add chiller.design_leaving_condenser_temperature to th schema? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Add as public comment when it goes for public review
docs/section22/Rule22-44.md
Outdated
|
||
**Notes:** | ||
1. Can we add chiller.design_leaving_condenser_temperature to th schema? | ||
2. Update is_chiller_performance_app_j() to take in which table to reference? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Update to take in chiller and table reference and update accordingly. Jackson agrees.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think Jackson will incorporate since he is workign on this function
docs/section22/Rule22-44.md
Outdated
- Note to RDS team - if there is missing output data the outcome is also UNDETERMINED with a message indicating that the modeled performance curves could not be evaluated. | ||
|
||
**Notes:** | ||
1. Can we add chiller.design_leaving_condenser_temperature to the schema? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Add as public comment
docs/section22/Rule22-44.md
Outdated
|
||
- **Check 1:** Get B-RMD system types: `baseline_hvac_system_dict = get_baseline_system_types(B-RMD)` | ||
|
||
- Check if B-RMD is modeled with at least one air-side system that is Type-7, 8, 11.1, 11.2, 12, 13, 7b, 8b, 11b, 12b, i.e. with air-side system served by chiller(s), continue to the next applicability check: `if any(sys_type in baseline_hvac_system_dict.keys() for sys_type in ["SYS-7", "SYS-8", "SYS-11.1", "SYS-11.2", "SYS-12", "SYS-13", "SYS-7B", "SYS-8B", "SYS-11B", "SYS-12B"]): NEXT_APPLICABILITY_CHECK` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Applicability should just be whether the proposed has a chiller right?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, whether it has a proposed non process chiller. I updated accordingly.
docs/section22/Rule22-44.md
Outdated
|
||
- Get primary and secondary loops for B-RMD: `primary_secondary_loop_dictionary = get_primary_secondary_loops_dict(B_RMD)` | ||
|
||
- For each chiller in B_RMD: `for chiller in B_RMD...chillers:` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
P_RMD
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Addressed
docs/section22/Rule22-44.md
Outdated
|
||
- Check if B-RMD is modeled with at least one air-side system that is Type-7, 8, 11.1, 11.2, 12, 13, 7b, 8b, 11b, 12b, i.e. with air-side system served by chiller(s), continue to the next applicability check: `if any(sys_type in baseline_hvac_system_dict.keys() for sys_type in ["SYS-7", "SYS-8", "SYS-11.1", "SYS-11.2", "SYS-12", "SYS-13", "SYS-7B", "SYS-8B", "SYS-11B", "SYS-12B"]): NEXT_APPLICABILITY_CHECK` | ||
|
||
- Else, rule is not applicable to B-RMD: `else: RULE_NOT_APPLICABLE` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
P_RMD
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Removed
docs/section22/Rule22-44.md
Outdated
|
||
- Else, rule is not applicable to B-RMD: `else: RULE_NOT_APPLICABLE` | ||
|
||
- Get primary and secondary loops for B-RMD: `primary_secondary_loop_dictionary = get_primary_secondary_loops_dict(B_RMD)` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
P_RMD
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Removed
This is in progress but creating a pull request so it does not get lost.