Skip to content

Conversation

claperle
Copy link
Collaborator

This is in progress but creating a pull request so it does not get lost.

- Note to RDS team - if there is missing output data the outcome is also UNDETERMINED with a message indicating that the modeled performance curves could not be evaluated.

**Notes:**
1. Can we add chiller.design_leaving_condenser_temperature to th schema?
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Add as public comment when it goes for public review


**Notes:**
1. Can we add chiller.design_leaving_condenser_temperature to th schema?
2. Update is_chiller_performance_app_j() to take in which table to reference?
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Update to take in chiller and table reference and update accordingly. Jackson agrees.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think Jackson will incorporate since he is workign on this function

- Note to RDS team - if there is missing output data the outcome is also UNDETERMINED with a message indicating that the modeled performance curves could not be evaluated.

**Notes:**
1. Can we add chiller.design_leaving_condenser_temperature to the schema?
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Add as public comment


- **Check 1:** Get B-RMD system types: `baseline_hvac_system_dict = get_baseline_system_types(B-RMD)`

- Check if B-RMD is modeled with at least one air-side system that is Type-7, 8, 11.1, 11.2, 12, 13, 7b, 8b, 11b, 12b, i.e. with air-side system served by chiller(s), continue to the next applicability check: `if any(sys_type in baseline_hvac_system_dict.keys() for sys_type in ["SYS-7", "SYS-8", "SYS-11.1", "SYS-11.2", "SYS-12", "SYS-13", "SYS-7B", "SYS-8B", "SYS-11B", "SYS-12B"]): NEXT_APPLICABILITY_CHECK`
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Applicability should just be whether the proposed has a chiller right?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, whether it has a proposed non process chiller. I updated accordingly.


- Get primary and secondary loops for B-RMD: `primary_secondary_loop_dictionary = get_primary_secondary_loops_dict(B_RMD)`

- For each chiller in B_RMD: `for chiller in B_RMD...chillers:`
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P_RMD

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Addressed


- Check if B-RMD is modeled with at least one air-side system that is Type-7, 8, 11.1, 11.2, 12, 13, 7b, 8b, 11b, 12b, i.e. with air-side system served by chiller(s), continue to the next applicability check: `if any(sys_type in baseline_hvac_system_dict.keys() for sys_type in ["SYS-7", "SYS-8", "SYS-11.1", "SYS-11.2", "SYS-12", "SYS-13", "SYS-7B", "SYS-8B", "SYS-11B", "SYS-12B"]): NEXT_APPLICABILITY_CHECK`

- Else, rule is not applicable to B-RMD: `else: RULE_NOT_APPLICABLE`
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P_RMD

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Removed


- Else, rule is not applicable to B-RMD: `else: RULE_NOT_APPLICABLE`

- Get primary and secondary loops for B-RMD: `primary_secondary_loop_dictionary = get_primary_secondary_loops_dict(B_RMD)`
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P_RMD

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Removed

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants